We have been so busy the last three nights of the weekend that I have been too exhausted to cook. So we had to go out to eat Friday, Saturday and Sunday. I know that sounds like fun but I would much rather eat at home. That is a lot healthier and it agrees with the wife's metabolism a lot better than eating out. But we were just too tired.
Friday we ate at the bar at Marco Polo which was another fiasco because Tony the bartender wasn't there. But I don't want to go into it because I am tired of complaining about it. It is my own fault for going there.
So on Saturday we decided to go Mexican. But on the way the wife wanted to stop to take a photo for Jim's Hawaiian shirt of the Day for Instagram. We ended up stopping in front of the newish restaurant next door to the Mexicans. It's called "Old School." As we are taking the shot we got photo bombed by the gay dude from "Modern Family."
It wasn't really him just one of about sixteen partners in this new joint. We fell into conversation and decided to give them a chance. A good tactic by them and we were amenable. They are part of a group of restaurants run by a guy with experience who looks for partners to put up the capital. It remains to be seen if they will let him run it or will too many partners at cross purposes kill the joint.
They have an extremely limited menu but that is fine if they get it right. We started with appetizers:
These are the meatballs that were served as an appetizer. You got three big balls and they were delicious. Nice and meaty yet moist with cheese and parsley. An excellent appetizer that was enough for a main course with bread to dip in the sauce. This is early days for these guys so it is important to get it before they start to fail and cut back on the portions. The chef came out to introduce himself and when I complimented him on this dish he said he wanted to make the meatballs bigger. I told him if he held the line he would have bigger balls than anyone else on Court Street. In every sense of the word.
Next up was a delicious baked ricotta with toated prosciutto on top. A great dipping dish with the little toasted pieces of bread that were included with the dish. Very oily and garlicy and good.
For the main course I had mushroom ravioli in a butter sage sauce and the wife had pan grilled chicken with roasted potatoes and broccoli rabe. Both were tasty but standard fare. Nothing to write home about but good substantial food.
I think the way to go in this joint is to get a bunch of appetizers which is what interests this chef and leave the main courses alone.
All in all we are going to add it to the rotation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
136 comments:
I love dinner w/ just appetizers. There are two places in San Diego we hit. One has half prices apps. on Monday and the other on Wed.
Palladianbate.
Appetizers that size and the restaurant is sure to fail. And what the aitch were you doing eating a second and then a third course after that meal of an appetizer?! Oh well, each man damages himself in his own way.
Sounds like it might be worth monitoring.
The meatballs are murder, but whatev, I could move to India but I would get tired of curry all the time.
ricpic is right. A restaurant would be wise to go with smaller appetizers, make them a good value (so you can order several like a tapas, anti pasta, and primi pasta course), and really push the drinks and wine to go along with them. Because you make your money on drinks not food.
"Old School" doesn't really say anything about the kind of food. Italian?
Well, I'll bite with this: It appears to me as if appetizers for the commenting crowd are back on the menu over at Althouse, after much holding forth from the chef over there on the ideal of quality writing as the main focus and dish to be served.
The "Which Map did you spend the most time on? Which drew you in?" querying invites audience participation, with readers eagerly volunteering to line up, sample the tidbits offered and share their perceptions. Almost as if AA and the Angry Bird have been looking over menus and deciding to offer more of what the highly relational, deeply interested, and deliciously perspicuous catwoman over at TOOP has been plating up.
HEy, Spinelli, can I record a conversation in Florida without both parties consent? I mean an "in person" conversation, not one over a phone. I'm having trouble with a neighbor. The idiot has been arrested on multiple occasions for assault with a deadly weapon. Next time his stupid drunk ass comes over here making threats I'm going to remind him that the courts are likely to get tired of his dumb ass showing up in front of them eventually, and send his ass some where unpleasant for his bung hole. At that point I expect him to tell me that he knows people that will do me or my family harm. I'd like to record that, because I think it would make for fun listening for local law enforcement.
Obviously, your advice would come with disclaimers and whatnot, and you might not know Florida law on the matter. But I'm curious as to your opinion on the matter.
Just video tape it.
Threats are illegal. I had my now ex- arrested for threatening to kill me. She claimed she didn't, but being not so smart and all, she did it again in front of the judge.
Where is Roy Bean when you need him, am I right?
she did it again in front of the judge.
That's funny!
Where is Roy Bean when you need him, am I right?
Seriously. This idiot next door has arrested at least 12 times just in Orange County on violence charges. He's beat the shit out of his (then) wife, he's beat the shit out of his (current) girlfriend. He's beat the shit out of people in circumstances I can't easily suss out, but at least it wasn't his wife or girlfriend all the time! He's tampered with witnesses. He's even assaulted a police officer. This is just in one county, and I'm sure he's been arrested in many places besides this one, just from what he's told me.
I've got to think eventually the courts will start giving a shit about this moron, but perhaps I'm wrong. But come on, a shit magnet is a shit magnet!
Excuse me, it was eleven times for violence. There are a whole bunch of other drug related charges on his record, and fuck-all traffic violations. Puto don't care about no damned stop signs, yo!
Icepick, Unfortunately, Florida requires both parties permission. I used phone conversation when we discussed this as that is usually the type of conversation people want to tape. But the laws, speak to either phone or in person conversations.
That said, if there have been threats in the past, you have a right to unilaterally video or audio the documentation of those threats. The person making the threats forfeits their right to permission since what they are doing[threatening] is illegal. Sixty gave good advice. Videotaping it would be more effective as evidence. I would suggest you get a restraining order ASAP. Then, he will be violating the restraining order and the cop should arrest him on the spot. However, the restraining order could provoke. I'll be happy to discuss this by phone or email to help you assess what you should do.
And, when speaking to Spinelli on the phone, keep in mind that both he and the NSA are recording it.
And, when speaking to Spinelli on the phone, keep in mind that both he and the NSA are recording it.
I assume everyone but me is recording everything I do these days. It makes the paranoia easier to manage that way.
would suggest you get a restraining order ASAP. Then, he will be violating the restraining order and the cop should arrest him on the spot. However, the restraining order could provoke.
Hopefully his girlfriend will talk him down when he sobers up. He's a many time loser, but for whatever reason she prefers to have him and his goddamned dogs around. I guess she just likes having her boys see her get the shit knocked out of her. You know, so they know how to treat their own wives in the future....
Excuse me, I mean GIRLFRIENDS. Marriage isn't an option for this guy - it would interfere with the welfare checks.
God, I love being poor!
I wonder how Boxwine Annie is feeling about her hopey changey president now that he wants to start WW3 and cause installation of the Muslim caliphate throughout the Middle East.
And please forgive me for forgetting my manners:
Thanks for the advice, gentlemen. It is much appreciated.
WTF is it with Lem? He keeps saying EBL is in his blog roll...but that's not true.
Why does he keep lying about it?
I guess Sixty was right the other day. He's a weasel.
Cody, Lem's Blogger skills aren't terribly well developed. SO he might think it's done but be missing a step along the way. Or it's possible that it's a formatting issue, since he is using some of the newer features.
Meade is bitching at Cracker's at the Crackerblog.
Pick, he just flatly stated that the cow was in there (the blog roll).
This isn't the first time he's said it.
Sixty Grit said...
And, when speaking to Spinelli on the phone, keep in mind that both he and the NSA are recording it.
And Spinelli makes the NSA look benign.
While I was looking for the Althouse and Meade Tim mentioned in another thread, I came upon a TOP post from a couple of years ago.
Man, Palladian was in there just sucking hard on whatever Meadhouseian body part presented itself.
Insulting other posters that dared argue with Their Royalnesses and everything.
It was...cute.
http://althouse.blogspot.com/2011/03/yesterday-larry-meade-human-hot-air.html
Why are you trying to start shit with me, Mr Jarrett, by bringing up things I wrote on that blog back when its author treated me like a friend?
Of course I'd defend my friends if they were under attack. My mistake was considering them friends in the first place, but I'm not ashamed of anything I wrote. What's past is past, perhaps you could be man enough to keep it there.
And EBL's blog is on the sidebar at Comment Home.
With regard to that old thread -- the obsession early on with Meade needing a job, the moniker "needy" and the phrasing "j-o-b" were all Titus locutions. This is another reason why I've long suspected that Titus is a multiple persona -- well that and what happened on the pole thread right after Althouse shut down comments.
Inga slimed the pole.
I sure don't have any desire to stop commenter-on-commenter violence, but I did see this:
My Blog List
EBL
March on Washington, August 28, 1963
4 hours ago
Take that for what it's worth.
Good. He did it finally then. Or someone did it for him. Because I checked, double checked, and re-checked before I said anything there and here.
It pisses me off because he'd been saying he was going to do it for two weeks and that he had done it for a week or more.
And Palladian--who said I was trying to start shit with you? Just because you were right there attacking people who were trying to say the things you're saying about them now?
And if I'd known no one would believe EBL hadn't been on the fucking blog fucking roll (despite more than a couple of people here having commented on it) I'd have taken a goddam screen shot of it.
Fuck.
Hey, I don't doubt you saw what you saw, or didn't see.
I just read your comment and checked - bam, there it was.
Even tiny rummy ESL weasel paws work once in a while, I guess.
@Cody
Betcha most of us here have written things just like Palladian did in that thread and feel differently (and comment differently) now.
I really don't get why you guys are so hard on Lem. He seems like such a cool guy. I'm not trying to take you on or anything...I love you guys.
I get why he was reluctant to add EBL, and I'm sure she (he?) can figure that out, too. Lem likes the Meades. EBL was created to diss them - but obviously has great content. It's not rocket science. Just put him in an awkward spot.
The drama queen can suck my dick.
The other day when Crack posted an email where Ann was talking about him he didn't get all uppity.
But I'm trying to start shit.
I think he might need to take a long look at who's always thought he was a cool guy and who's always said it--at TOP, TOOP and here.
But mostly, if he thinks I'm trying to start shit with him--well, he's entitled to his opinion. No matter how wrong and addled it is.
@Darcy - No way! I have always had a bad attitude.
And besides, I deleted all my comments over there, so I can say anything I want about what I might have written once upon a time and even E. P. can not gainsay my assertion.
That's my story and I am sticking to it.
And you did the right thing using the qualifier "most". You know us well.
There is something deadly in patent law called hindsight analysis. Patent granting invariably has a lag time. Hindsight analysis happens when a patent examiner imports his or her present-time knowledge of something back into time to try to antedate what someone did. In other words, sure it's known now but was it known then?
Darcy, I've long said I thought Lem was a nice guy. Probably too nice a guy.
Then the stuff with Lawnboy attacking people started happening, and Lem stood back and let it happen. Then Lem almost encouraged it by not even saying anything about it.
Lem can certainly be friends with whatever pieces of pond scum he wants to be, and he can comment on their blog and even put "althouse" as a category tag on his own site.
But he should also be at least a decent enough human being to not allow someone to attack people like that.
For one thing.
But whatever. It's a big world and everyone can go and do what they want.
Chickie, hindsight is 20/20.
And isn't it funny how Meade and Ann would attack someone like Palladian, who'd be as vocal in their defense as all that.
I guess y'all missed that part?
"Dana Loesch @DLoesch 11h
The Cougar Coalition for Gun Control: Bored of drinking boxed wine in their driveways, they organized to harass law-abiding gun owners."
@Cody
I understand that feeling. I am not shocked that Lem hasn't said anything one way or another about LSL's crap. He is not a confrontational type of guy. I would be shocked, however, if privately he hasn't been disgusted by it.
When I said "the Meades" I should have said Ann Althouse. Lem adores her still, I'm sure.
PS I never kissed Ann or Meade's asses over there.
:)
Oh, you don't want to know how much I fawned.
P.S. I never say never. Well, not anymore. ;-)
@Sixty
Hehehe...you are why I chose "most". :P
Cody Jarrett said...
Chickie, hindsight is 20/20.
Yes, that's the trite "folksy" way of saying the same thing. You'd be surprised though how grown men still strive to overcome it by argument. I believe that SCOTUS once had to put its foot down.
"You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink"
Hindsight may be 20/20, but people should want to exercise a little foresight too.
Which is different than foreskin. Only certain people want to exercise foreskin.
Regarding the past @ TOP. Why don't we just use the great, last line from Chinatown? "Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
You excise foreskin. Umless you like smegma.
Only certain people want to exercise foreskin
Only dogs exercise Fortenski's
Yeah spinelli. My bad. I was looking for this other Althouse and Meade that Tim was talking about and that thread was one of the top google responses.
I'm not good at that foresight thing. I take people at face value, which ultimately sucks for me much of the time. I doubt if I'll change.
Anyways, I pretty much detest litmus tests of all sorts. That's why Beckman invented the pH meter. Litmus testing was my falling out with Carol Herman. I kinda feel the same way about Ricky Branch and Leonard Elmore.
@Darcy: You sound pure in heart.
I used to trust in people like that.
Then I got scrod over about eight hundred and sixty seven times in a 7 month period and I got all jaded and shit.
I am willing to bet that the Meade rotisserie meme escapes her ken.
...but not her barbie?
Darcy, Lem added me. He said that Blogger had a glitch which delayed it and I believe him.
Lem's a good egg. He does like Ann, but so what. No one is perfect.
But thank you for those who encouraged him to add me to the blog roll. I appreciate it.
It wasn't there last night when Chickie posted the blueberry pie thing.
I'm glad he finally got around to it.
I kinda wish that just prodding him to do it hadn't made me some kind megadoosh.
Well, I mean I was already a douche. Or had douchelike tendencies.
But hey--you're welcome, Evi.
Glad you're there, EBL. That blueberry pie pic drove me crazy! :)
And Cody, I didn't think prodding Lem was douchy. At all.
Geez Darcy...
You might almost make me well up or something.
If I wasn't too mean and bitter and onery to do that sort of thing I mean.
And Raylan: You're sweet. Pure, huh? =)
"Seth, drain the well. There's a neighbor missing."
I think Lem is a spineless drunk, and as such, can never qualify as a "good guy".
But that's just how I roll.
I don't really believe in the "good guy" or "good person" thing. It comes from knowing that I'm not good. But I've said that before, and there's no proving it, anyway. Just belief.
I'll try not to react to the Lem stuff anymore.
I role differently.
It comes from knowing that I'm not good.
when you say that, do you mean not good like you're a bad person or do you just mean naughty?
I'm trying to ask that in a non-blake way but I'm not sure how.
Because I'm pretty sure you're being too hard on yourself.
I agree with Coarse Sandpaper.
Then again, I would. He's my sockpuppet. Or I'm his. I've lost track.
He took out Trooper and put in EBL. Exactly what Troop told him to do a week or so ago and what I reminded him of last night.
Not a "bad person". I just believe it's our nature to sin and I think there are a whole lot of people who do admirably well avoiding it, but still fail way more often than is apparent. I fail every day, but it's not like I give up, either.
I'm curious what "a non-blake way" is. lol
I know the answer to that one, but I'll leave it to my sockpuppet to respond.
And Darce, why aren't you at work? Or, if you are at work, why aren't you working?
Don't make me come down there!
Well I don't want to intrude on the self proclaimed official Darcy stalker's territory, and 'naughty' can be taken in several different ways.
I'm not sure I believe in sin as such.
Shhhh...Sixty...I'm at work. But I'm saving files from disk to file storage and it gives me moments where I'm just sittin' here!
Okay, just checking. And I wanted to see if I had to come down there.
I AM BLAKE-TE-CUS!!!
You guys. Too funny. If y'all are stalkers, you can stalk me anytime.
Bad news for everyone--I'm already stalking her.
Nice offices here, Darce.
Hello, Chip!
*waves*
Over here!
Careful who you invite in. I think that critter over there --->
has shifty eyes.
Yeah, but he was a tap dancin' fool!
Hehehe. I like grapefruit. With sugar on it.
I'm a sinner.
If you eat just the fruit in a grapefruit, it's sweet. It's all that membrane shit that's tart. Peel it like an orange and eat it sans sugar.
ndspinelli wrote...
"I'm a sinner."
I read that line and immediately set it to the Dr. Pepper jingle.
Not good...
I can eat it without the sugar, Nick, but I do think a little sugar enhances it. Just a bit.
Speaking of grapefruit, one of my favorite salads is peeled grapefruit sections and avocado over tender greens with Italian dressing. It probably sounds awful but it's so good.
LOL, Sixty. Not good...but hilarious!
Back to work, darn it....
Grapefruit juice and 2-3 xanax make a lovely cocktail.
The security guys at Darcy's office are really pretty decent. I got a ride to the Detroit bus terminal and a feral dog to take w/me.
It was weird how they kept calling me "Blake", tho.
It's the sun glasses, I am almost certain.
Are you guys being hard on Darcy?
See, that's the difference between me and Chip S: I don't get caught.
Actually, me and the guys in security are watching on the cams.
And, Chip, watch out for the dog. He might have the plague.
I'm looking forward to blake's review of the security footage.
I'm hoping he'll praise its "gritty realism".
There, Sixty. On a tee for ya.
Lem can certainly be friends with whatever pieces of pond scum he wants to be, and he can comment on their blog and even put "althouse" as a category tag on his own site.
But he should also be at least a decent enough human being to not allow someone to attack people like that.
Moderating is tough business. It takes a thick skin and/or a certain degree of dickishness to do it well. Those are two attributes that Lem doesn't seem to have. Add to that that he isn't in the faction of DecrepitDomicile haters, and even feels some affection for DD, and I don't see why you think he would do other than he did. I'm sure the whole thing has made him uncomfortable, as it is a squabble among friends, from his perspective.
You excise foreskin. Umless you like smegma.
I rather like Richard Cheese.
But maybe we're not talking about the same thing....
I'm not good at that foresight thing. I take people at face value, which ultimately sucks for me much of the time.
For trivial situations I used to do that. For serious matters I try to do a little better job of figuring out who I'm dealing with.
But these days I'm just taking a harder stance on things.
Who the fuck is talking about moderating?
I'm talking about being the guy who, when in a group of friends sees friend A go a little too far with friend B and says "hey--woah back scooter".
I've done that. I'd imagine you've done it. I know Trooper's done it.
I'm saying Lem should've stepped in and banned Lawnboy or anything as drastic as that, I'm just suggesting the little weasel could be a man instead of a spineless drunk (as Sixty called him).
And I hope it's made him uncomfortable, by the way.
That's the kind of dick I am.
LOL.
Chip S. wrote...
"I'm looking forward to blake's review of the security footage.
I'm hoping he'll praise its "gritty realism".
There, Sixty. On a tee for ya."
And, of coarse, I missed it.
That's fine.
My job at home - ah, home - was to cut up the grapefruit at breakfast. The grapefruit knife fascinated me and it was very satisfying the way that double serrated curved at the end tool fit perfectly between the rind and the sections and carved all the way around so easily. Cutting free the individual sections, what were there, 12? 16? could be tedious. The payoff? It was smooth sailing to eat a grapefruit knife cut grapefruit. A grapefruit -- my madeleine.
Darcy, That sounds great and I'm sure it is.
Cody, I take Zocor and grapefruit enhances the strength. I still eat grapefruit, but limit it. Does it so the same w/ Xanax?
Yay! Over 100 comments.
Time for the lazy bugger to put up a new one.
Yes. Yes it does.
Chew the xanax, wash it down with grapefruit juice and you've got a party.
I sorta miss the old days when they'd prescribe me zannies. Now I have to break into people's houses to steal them like all the other kids.
Good God - not only am I dealing with a pack of lushes, now I learn you are all pill poppers too? What the fuck happened to sobriety?
And where there fuck did I leave my bong?
I think Palladian mistook it for a new-fangled sex toy.
You might wanna wash it if you get it back.
Just sayin.
Such a boring life. No drugs, no booze...god. No wonder I'm irritable.
I'm talking about being the guy who, when in a group of friends sees friend A go a little too far with friend B and says "hey--woah back scooter".
Some people don't like and can't handle confrontation. I'd never expect anyone of such mien to do what you mention above. Lem is of such mien.
I've done that. I'd imagine you've done it. I know Trooper's done it.
When I was about 15 I learned to stay the Hell out of it when friends are fighting, and certainly not to try and mediate things. If people are fighting, let 'em fight until they're done.
Now it were at my place, I'd tell them to take it outside. But that's about it.
Lem views most of the participants as friends. Which is why he would and does suck at moderating comments. It's also why he's the guy for the job of running the place, frankly. Seriously, if I were in charge of the site, there'd be no sightings of Meade or Inga, and probably a few other people, and it would have much less a readership, most likely. Generating good will is like everything else in life, which means it has opportunity costs.
...
And yes, what you are discussing is moderating behavior, whether you want to call it that or think of the actions in question as "doing" moderation.
...
And for the record, I would have pretty much deleted anything that Inga or Meade wrote over at Lem's, without even bothering to read it. But then I do believe in a hard line.
Troop is a good egg (like I need to tell you all). That was very generous of him to give his spot to me. I am not sure why Lem's Place restricts the number, but it is probably his blogger page layout.
And thank you again Cody. I appreciate your advocacy!
Good God - not only am I dealing with a pack of lushes, now I learn you are all pill poppers too? What the fuck happened to sobriety?
If it makes you feel any better, I haven't been drunk or otherwise impaired by chemical substances since 1996.
I haven't been drunk or otherwise impaired since...ever.
Ah, so that's what it was - a Blogger issue. Like I said above, Lem's Blogger skills are very rudimentary. Personally I hate the new thing where it shows a bit of the most recently updated post at some blog. Just more clutter.
I haven't been drunk or otherwise impaired since...ever.
Ah, so you have no idea what you've missed: the hangovers, the barfing, the dry heaves, the hangovers, the upset stomachs, the blackouts. Good times, man, good times....
I have some idea.
Which is partly why I never.
My brother says he is not an alcoholic, because they have to go to meetings.
He says he's just a plain ol' drunk.
When he shows up I have been known to have as many as two shots of single malt, but that is my limit. No reason to over do it.
Fortunately he only visits once or twice a year.
Friend of mine had to have Woodford Reserve Thursday.
So he was sick and ugly and declared that Hangover Friday was no fun.
So of course...he had to have Woodford Tuesday.
Which made him ugly all day today.
Did I mention he's my business partner and we're in the middle of some really stressful shit?
Thanks for getting drunk and then hungover, fuckface.
Makes my day so much more enjoyable.
I was under the impression, Icepick, that Chips Ahoy and Chickie were helping Lem with the ins and outs of Blogger.
Whatever.
Based on the advice given in this thread, I have enjoyed peeled grapefruit (with sugar) and wind for dinner. Now to call Darcy....
Wine, not wind. Dang. Too much wind, er wine, with my gropefruit.
Dang again. Grapefruit, not gropefruit.
I was under the impression, Icepick, that Chips Ahoy and Chickie were helping Lem with the ins and outs of Blogger.
Sometimes they have, and I did once or twice when he first started. That doesn't mean they're on call at all times, or that he's asking their help.
Sometimes they have, and I did once or twice when he first started. That doesn't mean they're on call at all times, or that he's asking their help.
Like I said--whatever.
I have my opinion based on observation.
You have your opinion based on whatever it is you base your opinions on.
They ain't gonna mesh up, it appears.
Cody, I don't know why you're always looking to be pissed off at everyone for not living up to your standards (whatever the fuck those are) but you need to get your head out of your asshole and clean the shit out of your brains.
Lem isn't all that skilled at Blogger minutia. I know this because I was helping him with a couple of things early on. He's gotten a little better, but probably not lots, because he doesn't play around with Blogger all that much, based on the look of his blog. Look at the frequently gross formatting problems that CH has.
Blogger has newer templates out now for setting up blog rolls. It doesn't work the way things used to work, which is why most newer blogs on Blogger have a different look to their blog rolls than the old ones do. The newer one has a different functionality than the old one had. Namely, the old one was static, the new one is dynamic. Apparently the new one also has limitations. I haven't looked (because I don't care), but it seems it has a default setting for how many blogs can be in the blog roll. Perhaps that is a hard setting, and perhaps it isn't. Again, I don't care to look because I'm not currently setting up a new blog, and I like the way my old one is set up.
Now, if someone doesn't know that stuff, and isn't much of a programer (even by the standards of just using the blogger software), then perhaps they're not going to figure out why things aren't working out exactly the way they think they are.
But what you have is the opinion that anyone that doesn't hate Ann Althouse and Larry Meade as much as you do is obviously a flawed person. So you go looking for a grievance and find it, because you've got a shit-encrusted brain which distorts your perception of reality.
But the truth is something a bit simpler: Namely, Lem hasn't mastered Blogger software, and that is the main source of difficulties. Seriously, if he didn't want to add ELB's blog, he could have just ignored you and everyone else. But your theory is that he caved in partially to "pressure", and then was all sneaky and conspiratorial for a week in order to get around putting it on the blog roll, until finally caving in to "pressure". Occam's razor strongly favors the first explanation as opposed to yours.
I just laughed out loud, Michael.
Gropefruit. They oughtta make it.
They do, just soak peaches in wine.
Peaches who?
You went Mexican? Rode in a low rider? Snuck across a border illegally? Ate a big ol' mess of beans?
I could go on, but at some point my stereotyping might become offensive. Wouldn't want to offend, nope...
Eat shit, Icepick.
Where did I say people who don't hate Meade and Ann are terrible people or whatever it is you said?
I've said repeatedly that I don't care if other people want to like them. I don't understand it (and I'm not the only one, scooter) but it's up to them, not me.
I think I also said we should probably stop our conversation since neither of us is going to change our minds and we're each entitled to our own opinions.
But apparently you don't believe I'm entitled to my opinion.
I also appreciate how you line up a couple of straw men by saying what it is I think so you can then attack me over it.
That's bullshit.
And it's a coward move. I'd expect better from you. But I've been wrong a lot this week.
Cody, you are cranky lately. I mean this sincerely: would you like a hug? :)
I am cranky too, Darce.
Is it untoward to beg?
Nopes! *hugs Sixty*
Aw...
Thanks all the same Darcy--and I appreciate the offer (who wouldn't!) but probably better not.
Anytime, Cody.
Post a Comment