From: Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton
Re; Email server
CC: President Barack Obama, Bob Scheiffer, Lanny Davis. James Carville, Kreskin, Sandy Bergers pants.
Representative Gowdy.
This email is to officially inform that I will not be turning over any of the emails on my own private server. Although I did conduct official business on this account I feel I do not have to comply with your subpoena or any Freedom of Information Act requests at this time. I have printed out all of the relevant emails and had them transported over to the State Department so you can ask Lurch about them. I believe he is storing them with his Vietnam medals and the hat he wore in Cambodia.
This transfer was effected by the most secure method possible. Sandy Berger brought them over in his pants. That is how we usually treat sensitive documents.
I have erased all of these emails on my server and the remaining emails only revolve around personal matters such as my daughter Chelsea's plastic surgery and the contributions to the Clinton library from our friends in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Venezuela. Nothing to see here.
In conclusion I have one thing to ask you. DON'T YOU KNOW WHO I AM!!!!!!!!!!!!
6 comments:
Best one yet! The lapse in time to print out (what no axillary hard drives to copy to digitally...just make things hard by printing everything?) tells me that even those emails "Printed out" were carefully edited as any fool knows you can do with emails copies (use "forward tab" then edit, and erase the forwarding information...voilà!) with two years plus to manage it. See, in printed form you cannot tell if it was edited forensically.
The lady is a POS without peer.
She's The Red Queen incarnate.
What puzzles me is that she "thinks" people can't see through her BS. The bit about printing each email just screams "editing" that you can't detect. Anyone familiar with email knows better, and I do mean anyone. Why else would one burn through 116 reams of paper, nearly 3 pallets of same, 40 cases per pallet, to do what a DVD could do otherwise? Let alone just setting up a peer to peer connection and be done with it.
The lady is simply a ttong-ui jogag-eul geojismal aka 똥의 조각을 거짓말 ... in one of my favorite languages, that I was once semi-fluent in, from Asia that actually uses an alphabet.
Aridog, No. She just knows she can get away w/ this shit. That the rules don't apply.
Nick...you may be right, or she is just ignorant of digital communications and let her people do that "print it all out" bit without knowing how it works (or just for deniability)...e.g., the editing part.
When I've been asked to provide copies of my post-retirement communications I always just send it via DVD, CD, or digital transfer using the unfettered attachments email system....which for DOD is MS Email. All classification designations remain in place, even those I can no longer read per se.
You want to see proof of how it works, send me an email saying your mother is a beautiful woman, and I can forward it back to you, with you saying she's a ugly donkey with scabbies....over YOUR signature.
She is not even cleaver by half...I am just surprised, so far, that no one has called her on the print out thing versus simple digital copy unfettered. Printed out versions are NOT required by FOIA...and I've answered enough of those, plus questions from Congress persons (usually with a requirement of 72 hours max for response) to know how it works.
Give me the HDD from her "server" and I'll render it digitally without editing in less than 48 hours. Of course she's been warned about that and resists any outside access...for that reason.
Nick...a further note. When I was the lead contact on a DOD-IG-Finance office audit (whom I sat side by side with for a couple weeks) one of the reasons we earned a high mark was because I designed a small database that gave the auditor full access to records, unfettered by editing. I cleared it with my Colonel, who said whatever you do, do not lie, period. I'd asked if he wanted me to prevaricate a bit and he refused to permit it. He was of the few commanders I had late in my military time whom I'd follow in to harm's way....because he was honest and because he knew how to listen.
Post a Comment